Which of the following options is a benefit of automating flow tests without code? Select all that apply.

Automating flow tests without code offers significant advantages, one of which is the ability to build and deploy tests faster than a developer. This is an important benefit as automated processes streamline testing, allowing for quicker iterations and enhancing overall productivity. By eliminating the need for extensive manual coding, non-developers can directly contribute to the testing process. This accessibility promotes a more efficient workflow, enabling teams to focus on other critical aspects of their projects without getting bogged down by the complexities of traditional coding.

When considering the other options, it is clear why they do not represent benefits of automating flow tests without code. Manual selection of records for debugging is counterproductive in an automated process, which is supposed to minimize manual effort. Visualizing results with expected outcomes and troubleshooting flows for each failure, while valuable in a testing context, are not unique advantages that can be directly attributed to the non-coding automation approach. Instead, they reflect more general capabilities that can exist within both automated and manual testing frameworks. The emphasis here is on speed, efficiency, and ease of use provided by automating testing without the need for coding knowledge.