Which method should be used to convert workflow rules utilizing the "does not contain" operator?

The correct approach to convert workflow rules that utilize the "does not contain" operator involves applying custom condition logic. This method allows for more complex evaluations of boolean logic, enabling the combination of multiple conditions and operators, including the "does not contain" operator.

When you opt for custom condition logic, you can customize the criteria for triggering the workflow rule, ensuring it accurately reflects the needed logic of "does not contain." This is particularly important because simply relying on predefined operators may not encompass the nuanced requirements of specific use cases. Custom condition logic ensures flexibility and precision in setting up the conditions you want to evaluate.

The other methods do not provide the necessary functionality to achieve this. For instance, using specific comparison operators may not support the required logic directly. The Resume element does not relate to converting workflow conditions and is more suited for managing flows in an automation context. Setting a Static Resource is irrelevant to the conditions of workflow rules, as this pertains to storing static files rather than influencing the logic of rules.