Which aspect of orchestration is NOT correctly represented in a typical scenario?

In a typical orchestration scenario, stages generally do not operate simultaneously without any waiting period. Instead, orchestration is built on the idea of stages or tasks that are sequenced or dependent on one another's completion. Each stage usually needs to finish before the next one can begin, ensuring that there is a structured flow to the process. This is particularly important in contexts where the output of one stage serves as the input for another, creating a linear progression in the workflow.

The other aspects mentioned are indeed essential characteristics of effective orchestration. Visibility among team members during handoffs promotes transparency and enhances collaboration. Automated processes can definitely be part of orchestration, allowing for seamless integration and efficiency. Additionally, specifying conditions for completing stages ensures that workflows can adapt to varying circumstances, improving the flexibility and reliability of the process overall. Each of these elements contributes to a well-functioning orchestration environment.